Emídio Sousa was speaking to journalists at the end of a visit to Ambigroup in Seixal, in the Setúbal district, a business group that provides waste management, treatment, recycling and recovery services.
“We are far below what we should be doing in terms of recycling, but we have to be pragmatic. Civic awareness and environmental awareness are not enough. We have to encourage citizens to recycle,” he said.
The official explained that the working group created at the end of November with the mission of developing the Landfill Emergency Plan and the medium-term strategy with regard to urban and non-urban waste management should incorporate this idea into its conclusions.
“At least that’s one of the suggestions I make. It means that everyone pays for the waste they produce and receives as a result of the recycling they carry out. There must be a balance here between what we deliver as waste, as trash, and what we do, the separation we make. It does not reach civic consciousness. It’s not enough, we’re not there”, emphasized Emídio Sousa.
The Secretary of State for the Environment said that technology already exists in other countries that can be applied to implement this idea and that models will be studied.
This system in which everyone pays as they produce and receive a bonus as they recycle, he said, will pass through the municipalities.
“One of the challenges facing the working group is to think, on a voluntary basis, that municipalities can join these systems. Because these are very high investments,” he said.
Europe, he said, has set very ambitious goals, and they must be met, hoping that the working group will present rapid conclusions.
“It’s not enough to write good diplomas, good laws, but then you have to comply with them. And that is the challenge we have”, he said, adding that the landfill should always be the last option.
Before landfills, he explained, there must be a focus on separating materials, recycling them and extracting all possible components of these materials.
When there is no recycling or reuse solution, he added, there must be a solution for energy recovery from waste.
“Energy can be produced from some of this waste that cannot be recovered. So that’s what we’re also going to do in the near future,” he said.
However, he warned that all these investments to be made in the coming years take time and, in the short term, what needs to be done is to optimize the current landfills, a measure that sometimes means “a slight expansion or increase in quotas”.
A really good start that makes a huge difference is to start recycling of all cans and bottles. This has been used for decades in several other European countries and it really works well. Just a thought regarding a very verysimple solution that would benefit the environment and Portugal massively.
By Martin from Algarve on 13 Dec 2024, 17:32
Isn't IMI supposed to cover this?
By Greg from Other on 14 Dec 2024, 08:28
Then the government should drop the tax rate. If we pay ala carte for each item we use, why are we paying the highest taxes in all of EU?
By Dave G. from Algarve on 14 Dec 2024, 09:17
My primary concern is the abundance of single use plastic. I am not against plasitc that is used in products for a long(er) periods, but single use, like water bottles, bags, and such, is troubling to me. The recyclability of plastic is a myth. There are developments that are looking to change that reality, but at present plastic can not be recycled like we are led to believe (see the impact and preponderance of microplastics). Second, the onus should be on the manufacturer rather than the consumer, and yes this will result in products that are more expensive, which will then reflect the actual environmental costs of the product. Eliminate single use plastics and require manufacturers to use something else. Increasing the cost of plastic, single use in particular, disincentivizes its use and emphasizes reducing consumption of plastic instead of recycling. Recycling of metal and glass is more sustainable, where plastic is not. So, until technological advancements create a truly recyclable plastic, let’s reduce our use rather than believing that recycling of plastic is possible.
By Jamie Atwell from Other on 15 Dec 2024, 09:55
Not very well thought out. Who is going to pay for the people who measure the recycled garbage. It will cost more to implement than it is worth. If you charge people the illegal dumping will multiply. Think again Senhor.
By Ronald from Lisbon on 15 Dec 2024, 10:32
I already pay for my rubbish disposal every month, it's part of my water bill from the Camara. In fact it's more than the cost of the water. Surely the government is Lisbon is aware of this.
By Ian Watson from Algarve on 16 Dec 2024, 10:47
Saying that "people should pay for waste they produce" infers that people are not already paying for the waste that they and others, including corporate and state entities produce. Who does the author think is funding the waste handling at the moment?
By Jim O'Connell from Algarve on 16 Dec 2024, 12:57
How about we get rid of government waste first
By Miguel from Other on 16 Dec 2024, 13:37
I agree with J.Atwell.
The waste of plastic is incredible here.
One of the most obvious things I have seen here (as opposed to my home country) is spray bottles of cleaning products. They should be sold as a screw cap refill so that you don’t buy the spray part each time. The onus should be on the makers not the consumer.
Bring in cash back for returns of bottles and cans.
By L from Lisbon on 16 Dec 2024, 18:38