After her speech, her spokesperson quickly told the
media that the Republican politician didn’t really mean it – it was just a “mix
up of words.” You know, the way everybody randomly puts the word ‘white’ into
sentences by accident: ‘white ex-President Trump’, ‘white Illinois’, ‘white
MAGA patriots’.
What Miller really meant to say, of course, was ‘white victory for historic
life.’ It is cruel and wicked for people to twist her words like that. Yet at
that rally, coming out of Miller’s mouth, the remark really seemed to echo the
hopes and beliefs of the crowd.
It’s a safe bet that at least half the people who rejoiced at the
abortion ban are also believers in the ‘Great Replacement’. That’s the paranoid
theory that immigration is a liberal plot to create a non-white majority that
will overwhelm the votes and the interests of the real, true Americans (who are
white, right-wing Christians and loyal Republican voters).
This is a constant theme on the pro-Trump media in the United States, and
especially Fox News, but it doesn’t stop at America’s borders. Both the far
right and the even farther right candidates for president in the French recent
election, Marine Le Pen and Eric Zemmour, pushed the ‘Great Replacement’
nonsense as hard as they could.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán wallows in ‘Great Replacement ‘ rhetoric,
claiming that Europe is committing suicide by letting non-white and non-Christian
immigrants and refugees in. He pushes ‘pro-family’ policies in Hungary, but
rails against gay families as ‘illegitimate, non-procreative entities’.
Poland bans abortion for almost all cases, even for fetuses with severe
congenital abnormalities, and makes accessing contraception as difficult as
possible. It is also considering making divorce harder in order to increase the
birth rate.
Russia aims to halve abortions by 2025, and China has a similar plan in the
works, but in neither of these cases are they worried about being ‘replaced’ by
immigrants. They just want to rejuvenate their ageing populations by forcing
women to have more babies.
And Turkey’s increasingly erratic President Erdoğan, just to stoke popular
paranoia in European countries and give a boost to his right-wing counterparts
there, has urged Turkish immigrants in European countries to have five-children
families. (Turks are actually white, but they’re Muslims, so they’re apparently
still a threat to white Europeans.)
But it’s in the United States that the anti-abortion movement has made the most
progress, mainly because it is so closely allied with religion. And its
ambitions do not end with banning abortion.
Justice Clarence Thomas, one of the six judges (out of nine) on the Supreme
Court who voted to overrule Roe v. Wade, added an ominous comment to his
judgement. He said that the court should go further and jettison the entire
line of ‘privacy’ precedents that protect access to contraception, gay rights
and same-sex marriage.
Thomas is the most conservative member of a very conservative court, and
several of his colleagues insisted that the Roe v. Wade ruling does not
threaten other precedents under the ‘privacy’ heading. But that’s not
correct.
As the three dissenting judges said, “If the majority is right in its legal
analysis, all those (privacy) decisions were wrong. And if that is true,
it is impossible to understand...how the majority can say that its opinion
today does not threaten — does not even ‘undermine’ — any number of other
constitutional rights.”
Today abortion, tomorrow contraception, gay rights, equal rights in marriage,
you name it. Give the Republicans a majority in both houses of Congress this
November, add Trump as comeback president in 2024, and anything is possible.
And it would all be imposed by a minority of voters exploiting the huge voting
advantages of the ‘Red’ states.
This is a divide on fundamental rights so deep that it resembles the drift into the American Civil War in the 1850s. Despite the attempted coup of January 2021, nothing so extreme is likely this time. But a decade or more of violence in the streets, political paralysis, and even the rise of a strongman ‘state of emergency’ regime is becoming imaginable.
Everybody can recite a litany of criticisms about the failings of the United
States, and many of them would be at least partly true. But most of those
critics have no idea how frightened they will be if it goes rogue, or (more
likely) how much they will miss it if it just withdraws from the world.
Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.