According to a press release, CIMRL followed the final opinion of the consultative committee on the Renewable Energy Production Allocation Plan (CC-PAER), approved by a majority of other intermunicipal communities and metropolitan areas.
As “priority” recommendations, CIMRL asks for guarantees so that historical and traditional fishing areas (arte Xávega) are not harmed by the installation of the offshore wind farm off Figueira da Foz.
This infrastructure has “the largest dimension in terms of installed power (4GW)”, covering “a total area of more than 1325 km2 and, consequently, generates greater impacts on the environment and on other activities present at sea and on land”.
“Intermunicipal communities and metropolitan areas are very concerned about the negative impacts on the economic activity of fishing (…) with the guarantee of implementing measures to make fishing activities compatible with the existence of wind farms”, the document reads.
The voting declaration highlights the need for “compensation for companies due to the inactivation of some fishing capacity, particularly in terms of trawling”.
The authorities also defend “an independent technical-scientific assessment, with the involvement of universities and polytechnic institutes, to analyze the estimated impacts, in terms of economy, society and environment, climate and biodiversity, of the construction of new offshore wind installations in areas where could come into conflict with the fishing sector and in particularly sensitive areas, such as the Maceda/Praia da Vieira Site of Community Importance, an area that is part of the Natura 2000 Network”.
Among the priority recommendations, CIMRL "warns that maritime renewable energies are only sustainable if they do not have a negative impact on the environment or economic, social and territorial cohesion, especially in regions dependent on fishing”.
“It highlights the importance of creating new sustainable jobs, as well as supporting the use of wind energy to supply electricity at a local level, as important indicators of local acceptance of renewable energy projects.”
CIMRL “proposes evaluating the opening of an environmental corridor in the Figueira da Foz area, promoting the integration of offshore wind farms in protected marine areas and with maritime activities”.
They kill birds and whales. But eco zealots are notoriously braindead.
They also love driving cars, which batteries are fuelled by child slave labour (cobalt mining in Africa for lithium batteries) - because they want to "save the planet".
So it's not surprise they'll shrug off the huge explosion of disoriented whales washed up on beaches everywhere around the world, and depletion of birds, so they can feel smug about their country using a small percentage of their energy from offshore wind farms.
By Hart from Lisbon on 12 Sep 2023, 03:48
Another ‘Blot’ on the landscape.
By JG from Algarve on 12 Sep 2023, 05:27
Eco madness. Hugely unreliable, will never create the energy it took to build and instal these things. Massive amounts of steel, concrete and fibreglass. An ecological disaster. At sea they won't get near the intended lifespan because of the corrosive, salty marine atmosphere. A nine year study of wind turbines showed power output was below 20% of rated output for 20 weeks a year and less than 10% for 9 weeks a year, so 29 weeks a year they're USELESS. But the companies pushing the wind scam will have vanished when the truth comes and the manufacturers, mostly Chinese, will not offer decades long warranties on them working. Mugs have fallen for the eco lies.
By Russell Hicks from UK on 12 Sep 2023, 09:36
So sad..... Why!! :-(
By HF from Alentejo on 12 Sep 2023, 10:10