“I understand the situation of the workers there”, because “there are very few of them for the work they have to do”, but “this will further harm the lives of immigrants”, Flora Silva, from the Olho Vivo association, told Lusa.
“It is a very small group of workers for the volume of pending cases”, highlighted the association leader.
“The most important issue should be to strengthen AIMA to solve day-to-day problems. There are few people and we understand”, but “the ones who suffer are the immigrants” who are in an “even more complicated” situation.
The association movement has been calling for the reinforcement of AIMA, something that is “vital and urgent” and “should have been safeguarded” when the public institution was created in October 2023.
AIMA should have already been created “with a team of people to respond” to the problems in the sector.
The lack of human resources and the years of delays in appointments create “great instability” in a population that is already very vulnerable.
Alam Kazoi, leader of the Bangladesh Community of Porto, is also in solidarity with the strike, although he warns that “those who will really be harmed are the immigrants”.
“We are the ones who will suffer and the government doesn’t care because we are not Portuguese”, said the leader, highlighting that AIMA workers “are very tired”.
These employees “are working Saturdays, Sundays and overtime” and “we don’t know if they are receiving extra pay” for this additional work.
Despite this, “there are many people waiting to be seen”, even for small things.
On Monday, the National Federation of Public and Social Service Workers’ Unions (FNSTFPS) announced a strike against overtime at AIMA, due to a lack of human resources.
AIMA workers are “being pressured to work overtime” and “a public servant cannot refuse to do extra work”, the union leader stressed. That is why the strike notice period is between August 22 and December 31, he explained.
Related article:
I don't understand how you can come jup for their rights, but not know if they are paid for the extra hours...
By Scarlett Verkuijlen from Algarve on 14 Aug 2024, 10:53
I don't understand how welfare-seeking migrants are somehow sacred objects; such that they deserve more consideration than the native-born. This is a uniquely European pathology that surprisingly doesn't seem to infect the migrants themselves or the people in the countries they originate from. Has anyone ever heard about ANY non-European countries being tremendously concerned about the "vulnerability" of anyone that enters their countries?
By Tony from USA on 15 Aug 2024, 23:57
@Tony, this is nothing to do with welfare or state benefits, which weren't even mentioned but you bring it up as testament to your prejudice and bigotry. Anyone entering Portugal has a right to expect an efficient service from border and immigration control, and not disruption from a strike. That's just simple common sense. People expect public services to function. Hopefully you'll remain in the USA and keep your xenophobia there.
By Billy Bissett from Porto on 16 Aug 2024, 11:11
Tony makes a valid point regarding immigrants. No nation should consider itself obligated to provide for everyone who crosses the border, especially if it is done illegally. This is not "racist" or "xenophobic" but merely common sense and necessity. If some stranger entered your house and demanded that you feed them, clothe them, give them your bed, etc, would you do it? Of course not. Countries have borders for the same reason you have a door with a lock on your house.
By Cristiano from Madeira on 23 Aug 2024, 09:41