PCR tests that use swabs to detect cases of covid-19 may be less effective at identifying the coronavirus in a person than dogs trained for this purpose, a study published by the scientific journal Plos One.
According to the study, canines are able to detect Covid-19 better than PCR tests, both in symptomatic and asymptomatic people.
"The dog doesn't lie," Dominique Grandjean, a professor at France's Alfort National Veterinary School and author of the study, told Science News, noting that some errors can occur with PCR tests.
The study included 335 participants from Covid-19 testing centers in Paris. Of the participants, 109 were identified as positive, including 31 who were asymptomatic.
The authors of the French study said that soon more dogs could be used to detect Covid-19 at mass testing sites, including airports. If this materialises, France could join the United Arab Emirates and Finland, which already use the method to identify Covid-19 in these places.
I recommend all readers to google Thomas Quick and police dog Sampo.
The famous Swedish professor of criminology, Leif GW Persson, believes that dogs can not be used in this way.
- Everyone who has had a dog knows that dogs mark on organic material. And there is no difference in the smell of a human and a pig. Dogs are not intellectual role models and you can not use it as evidence in a trial, he tells SVT News.
How can dogs make a difference from other flu and cold viruses it is for sure going to become another legal justice abuse scandal if dogs shall sniff on people in this way, and please stop spreading lies, there is no such thing as asymptomatic people, when someone got a flu or cold or infection there are always symptoms like fever, sweating, rashes, feeling week or generally ill and cough and rinning noose.
Imgagine if people start to claim asymptomatic flu and cold for calling in sick and lift sickleave payment...
By Magnus from Other on 06 Jun 2022, 17:51