In the complaint delivered to the President of the Republic,
the Prime Minister, and the Ombudsman, to which Lusa had access, the Associação
ProPública – Direito e Cidadania highlights “the almost universal requirement
of prior scheduling, by telephone or by electronic means, for a citizen to be
received in any public administration service”.
However, this requirement, they claim, violates the constitutional
right of “effective, free, and direct access to public services without the need
for appointment”.
In other words, “the right of individuals to accessible,
expeditious and non-discriminatory public services has been violated for more
than a year and a half”.
According to the private association that fights for the
legal defense of the public interest, “the alternative means of care that have
been perpetuated violate constitutional guarantees”, expressed in articles 266
and 267, and “affect the general well-being of people and communities”.
Booking in advance for face-to-face service in public
services was part of the measures to respond to the Covid-19 pandemic, but it
was “only legally justified by virtue of the state of emergency”, explains
ProPública.
Portugal has not been in a state of emergency since April
30, 2021, and the ensuing state of alert ended on September 30.
Does Areeiro Segurança Social building have a functioning toilet for citizens/people with or without appointments, while they´re there? Because that should be a right, as well,-not to pee yourself in your clothes when you have an appointment and are there on time. Cheers.
By guida from Lisbon on 27 Nov 2022, 10:42
The Portuguese Public Administration is full of civil servants who literally refuse to work and invent the biggest nonsense to that effect. In fact, the bosses are chosen among those who will least disturb the vices of these civil servants, usually in their 40s, 50s and 60s. The Public Administration needs young, qualified people with the will to work. There are obviously exceptions. But they are rare.
By Diogo F. from Madeira on 28 Nov 2022, 18:14
Diogo. That is ageist and insulting. I could counter that many a young person can be found at work glued to their phone, rather than providing the service they are paid for. But, that would be petty of me.
By Ian from Beiras on 29 Nov 2022, 11:41